Procinctu Press | THE BLOG

Silver Manipulation 2016 – Make or Break (again)

Silver Manipulation 2016 seems to be at another make or break point. With the latest gush of commercial short sellers, you can expect a smack down in price. Then again, what if they fail? And how can we make money in the meantime?

Silver Manipulation 2016 – Short Position Spike

The commitment of traders for silver shows that there is a commercial net SHORT position of -73,677 contracts. The net short position has not been that high since the year 2008. It was followed by a 55% DECREASE in silver in 3 months, then followed by a 600% INCREASE in silver the next 2.5 years.

At this point, I don’t expect the same type of move, especially since there has already been a bear market for 5 years. But on a shorter term time frame, every time these shorting spikes show up, silver makes a LOWER LOW. It’s been the game during this whole bear market.

It’s no secret gold and silver are manipulated. GLD and SLV are ETF funds where ‘paper’ gold and silver are speculated and traded upon. However, actual physical gold and silver held within these ETFs, are only a tiny fraction of the amount traded. This allows for JP Morgan, HSBC, Scotiabank, and our bankster friends to put massive pressure on the price, simply by applying downward pressure via short selling.

The minuscule amount of contracts that are actually delivered in physical metal, allow the banksters to short without having to put up the metal. So every time the price of silver begins to rise, the commercial shorts go heavy shorting, thereby halting silver’s rise and bringing it to a lower low. The true value of gold and silver must be suppressed to keep the system afloat.

This charade will likely continue, until it can’t. Meaning, there will come a point where the price is lower than the cost to mine. That would result in a physical shortage as miners cut back on production. OR, the market overtakes the short sellers and the banksters don’t have the opportunity to cover their positions. OR, a geopolitical event forces a run on gold and silver and there won’t be enough available.

Any variation of these scenarios unveils the TRUTH. That paper speculating is NOT indicative of actual physical gold and silver. And the result will be one of the most epic in human history. Every time one of these massive shorting events happen, could be the last time for Silver Manipulation 2016.

In the meantime, can we ride the banksters coat tails during Silver Manipulation 2016? Can we share in their obscene profit when they give us the signal? I believe we can, and I’ll show you how.


Profiting on the Silver Manipulation 2016

Silver manipulation 2016 Commitment of Traders

First of all, only do this AFTER you have acquired physical gold and silver. These Silver Manipulation 2016 smack downs give an opportunity to lower the average cost in building your savings of physical metal. Once you have that taken care of, then you can profit on the PAPER manipulation, while taking possesion of the PHYSICAL metal.

A tactic I found that has worked for the last few years is this….


1. When the commercial net short position reaches a negative -55,000 contracts…. SHORT SILVER.

2. Once the short position begins to decrease, set your STOP at the high from the previous TWO weeks. (to be a bit more conservative, you can set the stop immediately, even before the shorts start to decrease, you would’ve been stopped out at the orange arrow with this variation)

3. Once you are stopped out, wait for the next build of short positions to over -55,000 contracts, then do it again!
This provides a way to kill some time and make some profit while we laboriously wait for the inevitable next Silver bull.


Another way to think of the commercial shorts is by using a truck as an example. Driving up a hill, the increase of shorts would be the pushing down of the gas pedal. But once the truck’s momentum reaches the top of the hill, or the point where pushing the gas pedal is no longer necessary, then you can coast and actually pick up speed going down the hill. With the shorts, the price typically drops once they begin REDUCING the shorts. It means they have reached the equilibrium of where the momentum of their shorting is enough to push the price lower, allowing them to cover their positions into a lower low.

As physical silver holders, we can make some profit until that inevitable time, when the truck drives off the road and crashes before making it to the bottom of the hill.

CAUTION: Always use a stop. while this is intended to lessen the personal blow of each Silver Manipulation 2016 smack down on our physical savings. We can’t be sure which time will be the last.

Let me know how this trade works for you. If you have one of your own, feel free to share it below.

In God’s will


disclosure: at the time of this writing, author is long physical silver, long intermediate SLV call options, and long short term SLV put options.

Silver 2016 – Facts, Triggers, and Triple Digit Silver

Silver 2016…. is it time to buy, sell, do nothing, pay attention, or just ignore it? Procinctu will point out some recent happenings, to help YOU better answer that question.


What we know concerning Silver 2016

To figure out future price action of silver, and everything for that matter, we must first identify and separate facts from fiction.

1. In the first two weeks of the year, markets generally begun 2016 with a steep sell-off across all sectors, including a ding to silver. However, precious metals reversed, decoupling from the markets as January came to a close. SLV  Nasdaq  Dow Jones  S&P

slv dow jones nasdaq s&p spy silver 2016


2. Short-term, this past week, silver followed gold’s lead, and finally broke out of it’s resistance put in place since December 4th.

slv feb breakout silver 2016


3. Long-term, MACD has been showing a massive divergence since 2013 on a weekly chart. Even short-term, MACD divergence has been occuring the last several months on a daily chart, leading into last week’s breakout. Look at the vertical lines to note a HIGHER low in MACD, but a LOWER low in SLV price.    Note: divergence in the MACD, in relation to price action, is a STRONG sign of a reversal. 

macd divergence


4. Actual physical silver inventory held in the COMEX is vanishing. The amount of registered silver in the COMEX is nearing the same level as it was when silver was nearly $50 an ounce! The steep decline began last year as you can see from the chart (noted via red circle).      Note: since the majority of gold and silver in the COMEX is never delivered, the charade is able to allow 28 owners to every ounce of silver, and over 500 owners to every ounce of gold. Effectively ignoring the laws of supply and demand… least while they can.

COMEX-1-Year-Silver-Chart-silver 2016

COMEX silver


5. The silver mining industry has a bullish mindset. Just recently, CEO of First Majestic Silver Corp., Keith Neumeyer said as much in an interview with Money Metals Exchange.

We’re trading, right now, at 80 to 1, gold-silver. We’re mining at 10 to 1, and we’re in a deficit. How can that relationship last? We’re going to have a racial compression, in my view, that’s going to send the price…and I’ve said this 100 times… to triple digits. I know that at $14 or $15 silver that sounds stupid and it’s probably hilarious to many people, but that’s where I think it’s going.


All of the above facts actually took place. They are not just conspiracy theories from a perma silver bull. They are all valid reasons to have a bullish perspective on silver 2016.


What to do to profit in Silver 2016

First and foremost, before anything, Procinctu has always encouraged owning Physical silver and gold. Periods like now offer great opportunities to begin acquiring, if you have not already. You can adjust up or down depending on your beliefs, but 10-25% of one’s portfolio in precious metals is ideal.
With that out of the way, and your physical silver (and gold) savings taken care of, let’s address playing silver through SLV, the silver ETF.


Being that it triggered bullish on Feb 3rd, you could play it short-term with a target of $15.36, but watch out for a pull back. My stop is currently $13.49, but that should be moved up as SLV continues higher. It has moved $.34 already since triggering, so if you are not in the trade already, you could consider waiting for a potential pullback.

To wear the bearish hat for a minute, the current price of SLV is outside of the upper bollinger band on a daily chart, which means it is overextended and might ease a bit. The 200 simple moving average is also impending.
Also, it’s no secret that SLV and GLD are manipulated…. one tactic I have done in the past is to hedge my holdings by buying weekly in-the-money puts anytime the price shot up, because it seemed it would always get pounded back down. Those things considered, honor your stop.

Now back on topic. As far as specifics, you could buy the SLV ETF outright as you would any stock. You can also buy the SLV, then sell covered call options against it to collect premium.

Personally, I instead bought some $17 and $16 calls for June 30 expiration. I admittedly bought these before the actual trigger, so their current P/L is 51% and 75% unrealized gains. Keep in mind these are out of the money options, so only do this specific trade if you know how, and understand all of the risks involved.

Another way to play silver, is a more leveraged vehicle… silver mining.


If you are looking for a cheap silver stock, with tremendous upside, check out Great Panther Silver, symbol GPL. The current price even allows for the novice to ‘invest’ in shares while not mortgaging their future. The seasoned trader can profit on it with sound analysis as it’s price moves about 6% every day on average. Current price is $0.58.


If you are looking for cheap silver stock options, I recommend you check out First Majestic Silver Corp., symbol AG. Again, only for pros, but AG stock also moves about 6% per day on average. What I like about this one, is that options in the coming month and nearest the money, often cost only .05 in extrinsic value. So essentially, you could trade 100 shares for only $5 in premium extra. Again, I have to reiterate, only do this with a sound plan.

AG has already made a big move and is currently at a resistance line, so do not enter until it breaks, and confirms that line, above $3.65. Conversely, you could look into $4 puts if it fits into you trading plan, and we indeed end up pulling back.

First Majestic has been providing nice pivot points and you can buy calls or buy puts on it in whatever direction it is trading. Personally, I like the company to own outright as well.


Silver 2016 Conclusion

Silver 2016 has a huge upside. Though it appears the bottom is already in, and the metal is about to enter into a bullish trend, it is still possible for one final push lower. That is why you should always trade with a stop. But considering all the facts, Procinctu thinks the bearish trend is exhausted, and silver is on it’s way up.

No matter the direction, you now know several ways to profit on Silver 2016…. whether it be through SLV, SLV covered calls, GPL, or AG. Of course, if you don’t have your physical metal secured yet, get that first and pay no attention to the price. Treat is as insurance and wealth preservation.

Note: If you do not understand options trading, or even want to better your stock trading, I recommend checking out TradeSmart University.

As always, markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. So always manage your risk/reward. Also, not mentioned above, but NEEDS to be considered, are the geopolitical rumblings throughout the whole world. Wars and threats of wars, negative interest rates, currency wars, devaluations, and on….. Silver and gold are safe havens in times of crisis. Something to keep in mind.

Stay tuned for updates and may you have a profitable Silver 2016.

In God’s Will


DAEMON Book…(and Freedom) – Technological Prophesying Juggernaut

The game is changing. Whether or not one is ready….Whether or not one is even aware there is a ‘game’….It doesn’t matter. Things like the Darknet, Google glass, Bitcoin (cryptocurrency), 3D printing, autonomous drones, Cicada 3301 have been prophesied already. And it’s up to us to seek the knowledge in applying these ‘things’ to bring about change, and even realize some profit. The game is changing, so let’s adapt with it.

Letters to My Teenage Sister – Leggings (and Yoga Pants)

Hey Sis,

I noticed you leave the house with some pretty revealing clothing. Well, I have no desire to see your every crevice, and I don’t desire that every man, out and about, see your every crevice neither.

In case you aren’t aware, leggings are a form of undergarment. They are not intended to be worn as actual pants, but more like panty hose….to be worn UNDER your pants or skirt. As such, when you do wear them, you should definitely be sure that your behind (and front) is at least covered by your shirt.

Biological Warfare | Revolution

Preface: I'd like to use this post as an addendum to the Ukraine 101 article. 
So many times we see foreign interventions starting up revolutions. 
Ukraine during 2013, and into 2014 is no exception. There may be a large quantity 
of people who legitimately want change, but ultimately, somebody else is paying 
for it....and they expect a hefty return on their investment, no matter what 
befalls the people.  -Travis

BY: Iliya Boris Englin

So the Russian revolution was planned and paid by hostile foreign powers, for no other purpose than economic colonization. That is what the newly released information shows, quite clearly.

Through the prism of this new insight, I am now seeing familiar, accepted and “boring” aspects of history in a totally new light.

In essence, I don’t believe that there can be such a thing as a revolution – an uprising of the people which succeeds in overthrowing an unpopular regime. I can only think of one event that possibly answers that description in four thousand years of recorded history.

Occasionally, rebels succeed in weakening an unpopular monarch, extracting some concessions or simply dying a more worthy death than their lives otherwise allowed. Very rarely did a rebellion result in a regime change – a coup precipitated by an inadequate response to the uprising or a foreign invasion. History records many events we know as rebellions. This is a populist uprising, possibly against a hostile foreign power – usually out of desperation, with little chance of an actual overthrow. The only likely outcome is a brutal suppression with reprisals – a major negative sum gain.

french | biological warfare revolutionThis is because a rebellion by the genuine population (as opposed to a faction of the ruling class backed by some of the armed forces) has very few chances of success. It’s a very unequal battle because the rebels lack the resources and the organization of the state. Forming such structures on the run is an unlikely recipe for success – the usual rule is that the government destroys the rebels first.

There is a high personal cost for participating in a rebellion. As one’s activities are usually well-known in the parish, the former rebel and his family has to run. Their fate is unenviable – migration to a frontier society, subsistence in a difficult terrain that is difficult to police, or life on the fringe of society as an outlaw or a mercenary.

For that reason most rebellions were little more than desperate riots that managed to form up into a military force capable of surviving a few initial engagements. Once the government forces were marshalled in earnest, the rebellion was doomed.

Such was the case in medieval Europe, where kings were not only entrenched in power, but also had the backing of the church. Most of them were safe from any anger of the common man, fearing only those who had a credible power base, such as relatives and military commanders.

Then came along the Reformation.

All of a sudden each nation in Western Europe had leaders with two mutually exclusive sources of legitimacy – Catholics and Protestants. For the next century the region was riven by brutal civil wars, which resulted in few compromises – most fights between the two confessions were to the death.

russian 1905 | biological warfare revolution

It was the first era when war could be waged by unconventional means. Instead of sending your own army to bleed and freeze in another country, you could support a side in a civil war. That opened vast new possibilities – very little money went a very long way. You only needed to pay a few provocateurs, smuggle arms and throw around a little money – a tiny percentage of what it would cost to keep a regular army yourself. The Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917 only cost the German crown a few million marks – a pittance compared with the costs of fighting the Russian army.

Crucially, your state organization could be lent to the rebels of another nation, assisting them with major logistics (for instance, sea transport), expertise they could not attract to their cause (military advisers, for instance) and refuge in your own country – a more dangerous strategy, but one that worked well enough even in the twentieth century. All of a sudden a government fighting sponsored rebels was up against the resources of a fellow state, and that changed the equation entirely.

Furthermore, you could modulate your effort to suit the circumstances. You could feed the rebellion at full throttle, to a final victory. Or you could trickle the support, pleading a lack of resources, to result in a prolonged exsanguination of the entire target state. The worst example of this strategy is the Russian civil war of 1918-1923.

Not only that, but a rebellion may be multi-faction, and you may choose the faction(s) you support to suit your means. China did this in Cambodia for two decades preceding the takeover by the Khmer Rouge.

Returning to the turbulence of Reformation – it was not all it seems to us today, an act of righteous outrage against the corrupt Vatican. Strap on your seatbelts.

The Protestants received heavy support from… The Ottoman Empire. It was no mere fomenter of trouble, but a major ally – there was even a Franco-Ottoman treaty. Without Turkish help Charles V would have crushed the Lutherans. William of Orange openly sent for Turkish help. England took on Spain in alliance with Barbary states, and plans were made for a combined invasion of France by Huguenot and Ottoman forces.

The Turkish motive was transparent – Catholic Austria, Hungary and Spain blocked Turkish expansion, and the knights of St John wrought havoc on the Turkish side of the Mediterranean Sea. Of course, little imagination was required – Western Europeans heavily backed the Ottomans in the war against Byzantium. The object, yet again, was economic colonization of the Eastern Mediterranean.

Those who find it incredible that Trotsky was financed from Wall St and sent to Russia with a specific list of corporate orders should think back to the heady days of the Turkish advance – neither side hesitated to support the armies of a rival faith to meet short-term objectives. If Genoese sailors could transport Ottoman troops and teach them how to build ships, and Protestant stalwarts could accept assistance from Suleiman I to slaughter fellow Christians – Trotsky’s ideological differences with his banker uncle are surely just digressions of fashion.
I believe that this type of warfare gained widespread acceptance at Reformation. Every event known as a revolution in conventional textbooks needs to be re-examined in that light. Yes, there were always malcontents and the aggrieved on the ground – but who was really pulling the strings?

As usual, all one needs to do is follow the money. Who were the real beneficiaries of the bloody English Revolution? Was it really about Charles I, given that Charles II resumed most of his father’s obnoxious habits, or was it a simple property grab?

Was the French Revolution a spontaneous uprising of the oppressed, or was it carefully planned and financed from overseas – like the Decembrist mutiny in Russia? The Decembrists were heavily financed from Britain – this was freely confessed by the leader of the rebels. That leader was elected in advance, and he had a prepared manifesto. The Decembrists planned laws and other actions that were chillingly familiar to the students of the French Revolution. They picked a good moment – when the royal succession suffered a hiccup between two brothers. Only one man – the newly crowned Nicholas I – stood between them and the scenario of 1917. Nicholas I delivered on the oath to his nation. The rebellion was crushed.

The French and British revolutions need to be re-examined with a magnifying glass. Those two nations are the origin of the fiat system – financing economic growth with candy wrappers, redeemed at the expense of distant colonies or major advances in technology.

The very same system which is now destroying the Western civilization. How that disease was introduced into those two nations is how we, today, are being undone.

obama marxist | biological warfare revolutionThis form of fighting needs to be viewed as a kind of biological warfare. It needs to be banned and severely punished. Handing out pounds and dollars to passers-by for participation in a street protest against Putin needs to attract retribution a la McCarthy – a process which America failed to follow through, leading to a resurgence of its fifth column in 1960’s. There should not have been an Alinsky or a Frank Davis – at the very least, they should have been driven insane by constant surveillance. Politics on foreign money should be a total anathema.

Like biological warfare, fomenting revolutions is a double-edged sword. The British socialist victory of 1945, an event from which Britain had never recovered, was a result of a concerted Soviet effort of the preceding two decades. But this was little more than the Russians finally learning the lesson, after two centuries of British meddling in Russia. Instead of entering into combat with the British Empire, they destroyed it from within. That operation outdid all of the British efforts of two hundred years combined, with socialists rushing to abandon India (to its fate), only two years after their victory. Modern UK is a tiny stump of its former glory pre-1945.

America too is struggling for survival. The Soviet infiltration of its opinion makers began very early – from late 1920’s, and it took a long time to bear fruit. However, it too succeeded unequivocally, with an entrenchment of a Marxist in the White House in 2008. In all likelihood, his successor will be even worse. Nobody in the world should gloat about that – a collapse of United States will trigger a global tsunami. No one will escape the consequences.

That is the trouble with spreading disease – in the end it always comes back to the perpetrator, and no one ever proves to be immune.

Ukraine 101 | Clinton urges less rhetoric…then compares Putin to Hitler

Disinformation. Propaganda. Special ops. Misdirection… The subject of Ukraine has been pushed more and more into the mainstream in the West. And with this ‘mainstream’ attention comes the omission of facts and outright lies we have come to expect. What is this all about? How did it start? What does it mean for me personally? Admittedly, this is not intended to be an in depth history of Ukraine. But it is to give a general knowledge of how the current situation came to be. So here is your Ukraine 101.

To test the need for a Ukraine 101 post, I asked around to get people’s story on Ukraine. Everybody I asked either didn’t know enough, or knew enough of the wrong things. When I asked my nanu (grandfather), he ended up giving a course on US failed promises, Roosevelt, Stalin, etc. But the current situation was not really addressed. Interestingly, my sister knew the most about the situation. Like, a lot actually. When I asked her where she got her information, she said her nail beautician is Ukrainian. Well, of course!

So chances are, unless you have your own Ukrainian beautician, you really have to go out of your way, and research on your own, to get the right info.

What you really need to know is this… Russia is certainly no angel, and it was draining Ukraine for decades. But what we are currently witnessing is a continued bloodlust by billionaires, neo-cons, western powers, IMF, and the EU. They are looking to wrap their tentacles and drain the resources from Ukraine in the guise of ‘democracy’. If neo-nazis happen to seize any power, oh well. If World War III is sparked, eh, it happens (that may even be the goal of some!). All that really matters is that their lust for power and wealth are temporarily satiated……until their next victim.

ukraine 101 | kiev before afterUkraine 101 | Spark

There is a complex history of this region that ‘Ukraine 101″ simply can not address. Battleground of Nazis vs Communists (and remnants to this day). The Breadbasket of Russia. Wrongs of Stalin on the people, leading to the deaths of millions. Evils of communism. It goes on and on. So we are going to look at ONLY the relatively recent sequence of events.

I only want to mention the ‘Orange Revolution’ back in 2004, because some of the same groups and players are back implementing tactics current day. But they are also getting a lot of outside help. What kind of help you ask? How about help from unwilling, unsuspecting United States taxpayers.

Right. Though Fox News and CNN may have left out that little tidbit, documents show the the United States Agency for International Development funded the very groups involved with the coup in Ukraine. So next time you see the news report of unprovoked Russian aggression, at least now you have a little more context.

In the video at left, The U.S. State Department’s own Victoria Nuland boasted about spending $5 billion dollars (over 20 years) to Europeanize Ukraine. She does this in front of Chevron and Exxon backdrops. Those are the same Chevron and Exxon that signed shale deals with Ukraine to be worth ‘billions of dollars.’ And that’s the same Victoria Nuland made famous by her “F*ck the EU” remark made while scheming in Ukraine. Nothing peculiar at all, right?

Again, there are a lot of back-stories, but this goes back to Ukraine’s decision to continue close ties to Russia, instead of committing to a trade agreement with the EU. Translated, the Ukrainian government decided to continue being a proxy state of Russia, as opposed to becoming a European Union proxy. The ‘western’ aided plan to combat such a decision was in the making for much time prior. So when the decision actually came down, the ‘revolution’ was all ready to go.

This is not unlike many other ‘revolutions’ throughout world history. Rarely can you find an organic revolution, but there is almost always a money trail. And this trail always leads back to an incentive either of power and/or money for someone or group of someones. Such is life.

To make another point, this does not mean that there are not legitimate grievances. In this case, there is a huge amount of Ukrainians that want freed of Russia’s grip. They legitimately wanted to demonstrate to show disapproval of Yanokovych.  They really want a better deal, of which they believe the European Union would offer.
But to give an example, check this video (at right) where one shirtless man, led thousands to dance. Of course the dancers wanted to dance, and they did so on their own accord. But what if the shirtless man and the first 2 followers were paid? Would there have been any dancing at all had they not started it?

Unfortunately, from what I surmise, their situation was taken advantage of, and they have become a mere chess piece. Those that went to demonstrate on their own volition would have no reason to think otherwise, but this was started with outside intervention. What I found (from half way around the world), is that the seed money was already there and the spark was struck from outside sources. Then, the legitimate demonstrators joined in pretty early, and continued to build. When the protest drew enough attention, the outside sources employed the provacautuers, thereby introducing the firebombs and murders. Read more about the biological warfare of revolution HERE.

In this case, it’s the EU looking for it’s latest state to plunder. It’s the neocons looking for the next war to reap their contracts. It’s the politicians’ diversion for their failures in their own country. For the billionaires, like George Soros and Pierre Omidyar, it’s unkonwn large sums of money through investments with their ‘prior’ knowledge. And through it all, Russia is propagandized as the aggressor. Again, I’m not saying Russia has no ill intent. They are as self serving as the next, but we need to put this whole thing into it’s proper context.


To understand Ukraine 101 from a different perspective, follow along this hypothetical situation…

  • Texas is allowed independence 20 years ago, but the US maintains presence.
  • Texas remains a major trading partner with the US.
  • Russia and Mexico fund groups to enact regime change in Texas
  • Texas has a coup and a pro-Mexican/Russian is put into power
  • Texas now will trade with Mexico
  • US protects it’s military bases and takes back the region with the most Americans, who want annexed with America
  • Russia tells US not to meddle in the business of Texas
  • Russia threatens and enacts sanctions for ‘US aggression’

Did you get all of that? Foolish, right? Who is Russia to create turmoil in the United States’ backyard, affecting it’s bottom line, then telling it to mind it’s own business?? OK, then the questions becomes…..Who is the US to create turmoil in Russia’s backyard, affecting it’s bottom line, then telling it to mind it’s own business?? Got it?  So now for the names and the proof….

Ukraine 101 | A Few Players Abroad

YOU -That’s right. As Victoria Nuland gloated, unless you are the one ‘collecting’ a government check, you’re paying into the federally funded United States Agency for International Development. Which in turn, through Pact, Inc., gave money to Center UA. The National Endowment for Democracy donated money to the ’cause’ also.

George SorosOpen Society Foundations founder – through the International Renaissance Foundation, George Soros also gave money to Center UA. Yep, the same George Soros who profited back in 1992 off of Breaking the Bank of England.

Pierre OmidyarThis one is interesting. Pierre Omidyar funded the revolution through the International Renaissance Foundation, but that’s not all. He also happened to create First Look Media, which runs The Intercept. The Intercept’s focus is on the release of documents provided by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. Yes, you read that correctly.

Is the United States being blackmailed by Omidyar with these NSA documents? Is Snowden himself a CIA plant to divert attention for something even more sinister?

John McCain – Back in December 2013, John McCain took his little Ukrainian solidarity trip to Kiev to provide for some flame fanning and saber rattling. Previous documented links between Soros and McCain are via Reform Institute and political donations.

John Kerry and Barack Obama, embarrassingly outmatched, threaten sanctions. This only serves to provoke Russia further.

“What difference at this point does it make” aka, Hillary Clinton, called for the rhetoric regarding Ukraine to be toned down. That same conversation from her continued to compare Putin to Hitler.  (Meanwhile, it was Vladimir Putin who did the most in averting war in Syria not too long ago)

The presence of Academi, big time billionaires, government secrets, working hand and hand….This is like a bad Matt Damon movie. This is the worst kind of bipartisanship in politics…..when the neocons and the neolibs get together, they spawn a really ugly baby.

Who was behind the sniper attacks? We saw both sides, police and protesters, getting picked off. There have been reports that the same snipers were shooting at both. This is an easy way to incite violence where is otherwise would not have escalated.

Ukraine 101 shows that all of these psychophants are just seething for war. They wouldn’t be fighting it of course, but your sons would. The warmongers will just be gaining money and power from it. They say it’s for Democracy Now? But it seems the wailing for democracy only counts when the wrong puppet is in place. Though there is an oligarchical influence, was not Viktor Yanukovych dully elected in Ukraine?

So what is this call for democracy. A CIA front? Was the neo-nazi pressence an unexpected consequence, or a calculated chess move? There has to be something more here. These people can’t be this blatant and inept, can they? Although, seeing their lackeys in the media and the mainstream coverage, there is no reason they would NOT get away with their meddling.

NOTE: I recommend familiarizing yourself with this release from PANDO…..and a few more sources 1, 2, 3


Ukraine 101 | peace dovesWe saw the writing on the wall in January when FALSE pope Francis called for ‘constructive dialogue’ in Ukraine. When the peace doves were released, they were soundly attacked by a crow and a seagull. I hope we all can agree that such an incident is more than just a coincidence.

March 16 is the vote in Crimea on whether or not to join Russia. Will the West accept the decision? What if parts of eastern Ukraine do the same? Will the West honor their decision? Or does democracy only count when it benefits a certain group, in this case, the Western powers. Pray for a peaceful transition.

In my opinion, What is comes down to is this. Ukraine is like a helpless woman in an abusive marriage with her husband, Russia. She has filed for divorce, yet a part of her still wants to stay with Russia. But not only does her husband abuse her, she is also abused by her lover, the EU/West. We are watching 2 bad dudes fight over a woman. They are both abusive. But can you really fault Russia for fighting to keep his wife? If a divorce is really what she wants, then to remarry would be adultery, so she is best served to remain independent, and not let the other bad dude lead her to sin.

Let’s pray to God her kids aren’t slaughtered in the battle for her. Let’s pray to God the men don’t drag their extended families into this fight, because that would mean World War III. That’s what it means for you. And be vigilant, because both of these men could just as easily fight over another, like Syria, if it doesn’t work out with Ukraine.