The True Catholic Church (Sede Vacante) – Intro to Sedevacantism

The Catholic Church has been under attack since it’s inception. Over the thousands of years of Church history, there have been Councils called to combat heresies, and clearly define the already understood Church teachings. Eventually, the enemies of the Church (like the modernists, communists, and Freemasons) found a way to infiltrate it.

While Pius XII was the last pope not in heresy, this infiltration culminated with the Second Vatican Council, in which heresy was not rebuked, but created, and thus, an entirely new religion. The Catholic Church is indefectable, so at the exact moment of heresy, the perpetrators cut themsilves from the Body of Christ. This is even if they retain the church buildings, and even the Vatican. What most of the world now considers to be the Catholic Church, is actually the apostate Novus Ordo Church, or Vatican II sect.

Jorge Bergoglio, the man people call ‘pope francis’ is a heretic and not a true pope, and he may not even be a priest. This is based on the grounds that the rite of consecration was altered.

While many souls are duped into thinking they are Catholic, there is yet hope for them. The One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church does exist. However, there is currently no successor to St. Peter, there is no pope, “the Chair is Vacant” …. Sede Vacante.

We are living in a great apostasy, and many teachings of the modernist church and it’s ‘popes’ run counter to the teachings of the True Catholic Church. For a more in depth introduction, you can START HERE (at Novus Ordo Watch). Sedevacantism is the theological position of those traditional Catholics who believe in the papacy, papal infallibility and the primacy of the Roman Pontiff, and yet do not recognize ‘Francis’ ‘Benedict’ etc as legitimate successors of Peter in the primacy.

To stay within this site…..Below there are links on where to attend an actual Traditional Roman Catholic Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. You will find a video of introduction to Sedevacantism. There are links to many articles on the Traditional Catholic Faith. Finally, there are links proving the heresies of Jorge ‘pope francis’ Bergoglio, and the impostors before him.

Please pray on this information, and for those perpetrating the great apostasy. Ask the Holy Ghost for guidance. Ask the Blessed Mother to intercede for us. Seek the Son, Christ the King, and the Church He left us. And let us adore God, in all His glory.

God Bless You.

 

 

Traditional Catholic Holy Sacrifice of the Mass

List of Mass Locations

Christ’s Life Explained in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass

Articles on Traditional Catholic Faith

There are many theological reasons why sedevacantism is the legitimate position….

Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae (CMRI)

Most Holy Trinity Seminary

Traditional Mass

 

 

False Popes

Jorge Bergoglio aka ‘Francis’

HYPOTHETICALLY CATHOLIC | Reformation Commemoration!?

General Information / Miscellaneous

Bergoglio/Francis and Other Religions

Another major point supporting sedevacantism, are the rejection of modernist ecumenical outreaches, which run contrary to Catholic teaching that there is no salvation outside the Church.

rabbi-bergoglio.jpg

Mr. Bergoglio (right), wearing a yarmulke, happily participating in the sacred rite of a false religion

Reality Check:

  • On Sins against the First Commandment – Superstition:

God may be wrongly worshiped either by false worship or by superfluous worship being paid Him. . . . The ceremonies and practices of the Jewish religion signified that the Messiah was to come, and so now, after the coming of Our Lord, they could not be employed without superstition [=false worship]. Inasmuch as falsehood in religion is a grave injury to God, this species of superstition is mortally sinful.

(Fr. Thomas Slater, S.J., A Manual of Moral Theology, vol. 1, 3rd ed. [Benziger Brothers, 1908], pp. 215-216; bold print added for emphasis.)

Neo-Traditionalist / Neo-Conservative Spin on “Pope” Francis

Bergoglio/Francis and the Sacred Liturgy

On the Fake Humility of “Pope” Francis: Desacralizing the Papacy

 

 

Joseph Alois Ratzinger aka ‘Benedict XVI’

Ratzinger against Traditionalists:

“We must be on guard against minimizing these movements [that oppose Vatican II]. Without a doubt, they represent a sectarian zealotry that is the antithesis of Catholicity. We cannot resist them too firmly.”

(Citation Info: Joseph Ratzinger, Principles of Catholic Theology, Ignatius Press, 1987, pp. 389-90; underlining added. German original: Katholische Prinzipienlehre, 1982)

On the Resignation of “Pope” Benedict XVI in 2013

 

 

Karol Wojtyla aka ‘John Paul II’

General Information

 

jp2-kisses-koran.jpg

A Saint He Ain’t:
“Pope” John Paul II kissing the Muslim Koran on May 14, 1999

Free Book for Download (PDF):
Karol Wojtyla Beatified?… Never!
by Fr. Luigi Villa

villa-wojtyla.jpg

also available in Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and French (click here)
See Also: Chiesa Viva Special Edition on Karol Wojtyla (Italian / PDF)

 

Video:
John Paul II and the Mark of Shiva
with a response to Jimmy Akin of Catholic Answers

 

Article:
Wojtyla Gets a Third Eye –
John Paul II’s Pilgrimage to India (1986)

by John K. Weiskittel

mark of shiva.jpg

John Paul II receives the Mark of Hindu Goddess Shiva

 

 

Video:
World Day of Prayer for Peace in Assisi (1986)

 

Article:
Voodoo You Trust? John Paul II’s Betrayal
of the Faith in Benin (1993)

by John K. Weiskittel

voodoo altar.jpg

 

Article:
The Canonization of John Paul II:
A Catholic Perspective

by Athanasius

canonization-jp2.jpg

 

Radio Broadcast:
“The Canonization of Vatican II”
Listen on demand at any time

 

More Videos from the Reign of “Saint” John Paul II

John Porn II: Wojtyla’s Love for Immodesty & Nudity
(CAUTION! Links below contain nudity)

John Paul II & the Assisi Interfaith Abominations

John Paul II’s Modernist Philosophy & Theology

Book Series by Fr. Johannes Dormann exposing the Modernist Theology of Karol Wojtyla:

 

Catholic Reality Check against John Paul II

Against John Paul II’s Ecumenism:

Against Various Errors promoted by John Paul II:

  • “Everyone should avoid familiarity or friendship with anyone suspected of belonging to Masonry or to affiliated groups. Know them by their fruits and avoid them. Every familiarity should be avoided, not only with those impious libertines who openly promote the character of the sect, but also with those who hide under the mask of universal tolerance, respect for all religions, and the craving to reconcile the maxims of the Gospel with those of the revolution. These men seek to reconcile Christ and Belial, the Church of God and the state without God.”
    —Pope Leo XIII, Encyclical Custodi di Quella Fede, n. 15, 1892
  • “It is impious to say, ‘I respect every religion.’ This is as much as to say: I respect the devil as much as God, vice as much as virtue, falsehood as much as truth, dishonesty as much as honesty, Hell as much as Heaven.”
    Fr. Michael MüllerThe Church and Her Enemies (source here)
  • “Even on the plea of promoting unity it is not allowed to dissemble one single dogma; for, as the Patriarch of Alexandria warns us, ‘although the desire of peace is a noble and excellent thing, yet we must not for its sake neglect the virtue of loyalty in Christ.’ Consequently, the much desired return of erring sons to true and genuine unity in Christ will not be furthered by exclusive concentration on those doctrines which all, or most, communities glorying in the Christian name accept in common. The only successful method will be that which bases harmony and agreement among Christ’s faithful ones upon all the truths, and the whole of the truths, which God has revealed.”
    —Pope Pius XIIEncyclical Orientalis Ecclesiae, n. 16, 1944
  • “…[I]t is not allowable for anyone to produce another faith, that is, to write or to compose or to consider or to teach others; those who dare to compose another faith, or to support or to teach or to hand on another creed to those who wish to turn to knowledge of the truth, whether from Hellenism or Judaism or indeed from any heresy whatsoever, or to introduce novelty of speech, that is, invention of terms, so as to overturn what has now been defined by us, such persons, if they are bishops or clerics, are deprived of their episcopacy or clerical rank, and if they are monks or layfolk they are excommunicated.”
    —Pope St. Leo IIThird Council of Constantinople, 681
  • “We ought to remember that Catholics are, far more than the Jews were, the chosen people of God….”
    —Fr. Richard F. Clarke, “The Ministry of Jesus: Short Meditations on the Public Life of Our Lord”, in Beautiful Pearls of Catholic Truth, p. 542)
  • “Trusting in God and relying on His ever present help, [St. Benedict] went south and arrived at a fort ‘called Cassino situated on the side of a high mountain…; on this stood an old temple where Apollo was worshipped by the foolish country people, according to the custom of the ancient heathens. Around it likewise grew groves, in which even till that time the mad multitude of infidels used to offer their idolatrous sacrifices. The man of God coming to that place broke the idol, overthrew the altar, burned the groves, and of the temple of Apollo made a chapel of St. Martin. Where the profane altar had stood he built a chapel of St. John; and by continual preaching he converted many of the people thereabout’.”
    —Pope Pius XIIEncyclical Fulgens Radiatur, n. 11, 1947; showing the anti-ecumenical nature of Roman Catholicism and that the true path to the conversion and salvation of people is not to respect their false religions but to lead them out of them into the True Faith
  • “…diabolical error, when it has artfully colored its lies, easily clothes itself in the likeness of truth while very brief additions or changes corrupt the meaning of expressions; and confession, which usually works salvation, sometimes, with a slight change, inches toward death.”
    —Pope Clement XIIIEncyclical In Dominico Agro, n. 2, 1761
  • “Let no Christian therefore, whether philosopher or theologian, embrace eagerly and lightly whatever novelty happens to be thought up from day to day, but rather let him weigh it with painstaking care and a balanced judgment, lest he lose or corrupt the truth he already has, with grave danger and damage to his faith.”
    —Pope Pius XIIEncyclical Humani Generis, n. 30, 1950
  • “It is impossible to approve in Catholic publications a style inspired by unsound novelty which seems to deride the piety of the faithful and dwells on the introduction of a new order of Christian life, on new directions of the Church, on new aspirations of the modern soul, on a new social vocation of the clergy, on a new Christian civilization, and many other things of the same kind.”
    —Pope Leo XIII, Instruction to the Sacred Congregation of Extraordinary Ecclesiastical Affairs, 1902; quoted by Pope St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis, n. 55, 1907
  • “…the great movement of apostasy being organized in every country for the establishment of a One-World Church which shall have neither dogmas, nor hierarchy, neither discipline for the mind, nor curb for the passions, and which, under the pretext of freedom and human dignity, would bring back to the world (if such a Church could overcome) the reign of legalized cunning and force, and the oppression of the weak, and of all those who toil and suffer. […] Indeed, the true friends of the people are neither revolutionaries, nor innovators: they are traditionalists.”
    —Pope St. Pius X, Apostolic Letter Notre Charge Apostolique, 1910

 

Albino Luciani aka ‘John Paul I’

From NovusOrdoWatch – On August 26, 1978, the Modernist Sect elected Bp. Albino Luciani to the “papal office”, and he took the name John Paul I, in honor of John XXIII and Paul VI. He was the first papal claimant in history to take a double name. (At the time, people joked that his successor would take the name Ringo George — a reference to the rock band The Beatles, whose members consisted of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, and George Harrison.)

In the Novus Ordo Church Luciani is, of course, in line for being declared a “saint”, just like all other deceased false Popes who aren’t canonized yet. Many semi-traditionalists seem to have a soft spot for “Pope” Luciani, and perhaps this has to do with the fact that he died unexpectedly a mere 33 days after his election, on September 28 of the same year. Although circumstances suggest that he was in fact murdered after attempting to expose and root out Freemasons from the Vatican and clean up the Vatican Bank, this tragic reality cannot blind us to the fact that, at the end of the day, even though he may not have had any sympathy for the Masons, Albino Luciani was still a Modernist who participated in the destruction of Catholicism and publicly adhered to the errors of Vatican II and Paul VI. In fact, in some ways Francis’ “humble Pope” gig was already anticipated by John Paul I.

Let’s recap: It was John Paul I who abolished the solemn papal coronation ceremony, replacing it instead with a mere “installation”. It was John Paul I who stopped using the gestatorial chair and only resumed its use after people complained they could no longer see their “Pope”. It was John Paul I who first chose to use a curious double name because he couldn’t decide which of his Modernist predecessors — John XXIII and Paul VI — he loved more. It was Albino Luciani who advised “Pope” Paul VI in 1965 to ease the restrictions on the use of contraceptives, even though Paul VI ultimately decided against it (well, sort of).

The following text is taken from a professional biographical database and gives an interesting picture of Luciani. Although reluctant at first, he ended up embracing the same Modernist ideas of his two predecessors whom he so much admired, even when he knew full well that the novel teachings contradicted the old. He liked to participate in meetings with the open Modernists at the Second Vatican Council and dialogue with them, instead of shunning and denouncing them:

Bishop Luciani kept a low profile during Vatican Council II, commenced in 1962 by Pope John for the reformation, or, as it was more delicately put officially, ‘renewal,’ of the Roman Catholic Church. He was among those prelates who had difficulty in adjusting to some of the liberalizing steps taken by the council, such as the lessening of Papal authority in favor of the ‘collegiality’ of the world’s bishops. ‘The thesis I found hardest to live with was the one on religious freedom,’ he said later. ‘For years I had taught the public law theses of Cardinal [Alfredo] Ottaviani, according to which only the truth [as held by the Roman Catholic Church] had rights. In the end, I convinced myself we had been wrong.’

Like other conservatives at the council, Luciani disagreed with the liberal faction when, in the conservative view, it seemed to be calling for an interpretation of the church’s mission that would reduce it to a mere worldly agency of social action. Like them also, he was repelled by the efforts of some progressives from Germany and Holland to challenge such traditions as clerical celibacy and an exclusively male priesthood. But unlike most of the others, he tried to keep lines of communication open and participated in many meetings with the widely shunned progressives.

Bishop Luciani was a consultant to the sixty-member international commission formed by Pope Paul VI in 1963 to make recommendations for dealing with the problem of birth control. Luciani personally concluded that some accommodation for artificial birth control could be made within the teachings of the church, and he wrote to the Pope to that effect. The majority view in the report submitted by the commission in 1965 was that a modification of the traditional ban on contraception was possible and that, at the very least, no blanket prohibition should be made. Against the majority’s recommendation, Pope Paul in 1968 issued the encyclical Humanae Vitae, which firmly restated the papal opposition to birth control in all its forms, including the “pill.” Although saddened by the drift of middle-class Catholics from the church that was accelerated by the encyclical, Bishop Luciani, loyal to his Pope, suppressed any negative thoughts he might have entertained about Humanae Vitae.

(Source: Current Biography [Bio Ref Bank], 1978; Database: Biography Reference Bank [H.W. Wilson], s.v. “John Paul I, Pope.”)

It is true that, when compared to the trite Modernist drivel we’ve heard for decades from Francis, Benedict XVI, John Paul II, and Paul VI, Luciani could sound downright conservative at times and might have seemed “not too bad”, but this is merely by comparison and indicative of the terrible shape that “Catholicism” finds itself in today. The Vatican II Sect can hardly be the standard by which we measure orthodoxy. It would be like asking an alcoholic how much beer one should drink.

Let’s look at some more evidence of the liberalism of Albino Luciani.

In a sermon preached in 1976, he remarked that just before the Second Vatican Council began, he “happened to read at the same time two writings: one by Freud, the other by Gandhi” (Lori Pieper, ed., A Passionate Adventure: Living the Catholic Faith Today, [Bronx, NY: Tau Cross Books, 2013], Kindle loc. 4564); and although he denounced the anti-Christian Jewish Talmud as “full of fables and childish and bizarre things,” he also held that the diabolical work “can help us in understanding the Gospel at certain points” (ibid., loc. 2462). For the record, the Talmud “teaches that Jesus Christ was illegitimate and was conceived during menstruation; that he had the soul of Esau; that he was a fool, a conjurer, a seducer; that he was crucified, buried in hell and set up as an idol ever since by his followers” (Rev. I. B. Pranaitis, The Talmud Unmasked, p. 30).

In September of 1978, after calling U.S. President Jimmy Carter a “fervent Christian”, John Paul I said as part of his Sunday Angelus address:

And [Israeli] Premier Begin recalls that the Jewish people once passed difficult moments and addressed the Lord complaining and saying: “You have forsaken us, you have forgotten us!” “No!”—He replied through Isaiah the Prophet—”can a mother forget her own child? But even if it should happen, God will never forget his people”.

Also we who are here have the same sentiments; we are the objects of undying love on the part of God. We know: he has always his eyes open on us, even when it seems to be dark. He is our father; even more he is our mother. He does not want to hurt us, He wants only to do good to us, to all of us. If children are ill, they have additional claim to be loved by their mother. And we too, if by chance we are sick with badness, on the wrong track, have yet another claim to be loved by the Lord.

(John Paul I, Angelus Address, Sep. 10, 1978; underlining added.)

Although it is true that Almighty God loves us and takes care of us in a way that is like to a mother (see Is 49:15; Mt 23:37), it is complete nonsense to say not only that God is our mother, but even that He is our mother more so than He is our Father. The Most Holy Trinity has revealed Himself as Father, Son, and Holy Ghost (see Mt 28:19). Our Lord Jesus Christ referred to the First Person of the Blessed Trinity as “Father”, not “Mother” (see Mk 14:36), and taught us to do the same (see Mt 6:9). And as far as mother goes, our Lord gave His own Mother — the Blessed Virgin Mary — to us to be our spiritual mother (see Jn 19:26-27).

We have to remember the dire warnings of the true Popes about the dangers of heresy and other errors that work the destruction of souls, especially when they are not clearly out in the open but hide behind ambiguity and seeming contradiction, and are uttered by people who seem of good will:

  • Pope Clement XIII warned against “diabolical error [which] easily clothes itself in the likeness of truth while very brief additions or changes corrupt the meaning of expressions; and confession, which usually works salvation, sometimes, with a slight change, inches toward death” (Encyclical In Dominico Agro, n. 2)
  • Pope Pius VI rebuked those who “by means of slight changes or additions in phraseology, distort the confession of the faith that is necessary for our salvation, and lead the faithful by subtle errors to their eternal damnation” (Bull Auctorem Fidei)
  • Pope Leo XIII warned that “[t]here can be nothing more dangerous than those heretics who admit nearly the whole cycle of doctrine, and yet by one word, as with a drop of poison, infect the real and simple faith taught by our Lord and handed down by Apostolic tradition” (Encyclical Satis Cognitum, n. 9)

Likewise, Fr. Felix Sarda’s Vatican-approved work Liberalism is a Sin is very instructive with regard to the dangers of and the methods used by Liberals/Modernists, and the excuses that are typically made to escape condemnation.

Finally, the biggest Luciani whopper of them all came on Sunday, September 17, 1978, again at an Angelus address: John Paul I publicly praised Giosuè Carducci (1835-1907), an anti-clerical Italian poet and educator who was actually a Satanist! “Pope” Luciani said:

Italian professors have, in their history, classic cases of exemplary love and dedication to education. Giosuè Carducci was an university professor in Bologna. He went to Florence to some commemorative acts. One day, in the afternoon, he went to say good-bye to the Minister of Public Instruction. “No, no—said the Minister—, stay also until tomorrow”. “Excellence, it is not possible for me. Tomorrow, I have a class in the university and the boys will be waiting for me”. “I exempt you”. “You can exempt me, but I do not exempt myself”. Professor Carducci really had a concept as high about education as about students. He belonged to the class of those who say: “to teach Latin to John, it is not enough to know Latin, it is also necessary to know John and love him”. And also: “As much is worth the lesson as the training”.

(John Paul I, Angelus Address, Sep. 17, 1978; original Italian version here)

“Papal” praise for the Satanist Carducci, who called Catholic priests “the real and unaltering enemies of Italy” and composed a blasphemous and anti-Catholic ode called “Hymn to Satan”! See this and more evidence of the Satanism of Carducci at the following link:

How can a supposedly Catholic Pope admire and commend a follower of the devil himself?! “For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever?” (2 Cor 6:14-15).

The fact is that John Paul I was another wolf in sheep’s clothing. Yes, he had a very kind demeanor and seemedbenevolent, but no man of God would do and say the things Luciani did and said.

At the end of the day, Bp. Luciani was another dangerous Novus Ordo Modernist, whose attachment to the errors of Angelo Roncalli and Giovanni Montini found permanent expression in the choice of his “papal” name, “John Paul.” The fact that he added the numeral “I” — “the First” — to his name from the very beginning indicates that he wanted to begin an entire tradition of honoring Roncalli and Montini in the “papal” names henceforth.

And the rest, as they say, is history.

 

 

Giovanni Battista Montini aka ‘Paul VI’

From NovusOrdoWatch – On August 6, 1978, Bishop Giovanni Battista Montini, the man who claimed to be the Pope of the Catholic Church from 1963 to 1978 under the name of “Paul VI”, was called by God to judgment. It was Paul VI, more than any other of the Conciliar papal pretenders, who visibly transformed the Holy Roman Catholic Church into the Modernist Novus Ordo Sect of the Second Vatican Council, whose documents he alone approved and promulgated. More than anyone else, Vatican II is the work of Montini. The church he left behind on August 6, 1978, was and looked nothing like the Catholic Church Pope Pius XII had bequeathed to the college of cardinals less than 20 years before, and whose transformation had already been prepared and begun by Paul’s immediate charlatan predecessor, John XXIII.

We are now well into the 21st century, and the False Vatican II Church has since “canonized” its false shepherds to the best of its ability, with more to come: John XXIII and John Paul II declared “saints”Paul VI “beatified”John Paul I on the way to “beatification”; and of course Benedict XVI and Francis are still alive — though surely their bogus sainthood will soon be called for as well after they pass on.

Given the key role “Blessed” Paul VI has played in the subversion of the Catholic Church, as well as the curious circumstances surrounding his death, it is useful to call to mind the person of Giovanni Montini, an anti-Catholic deceiver of the worst sort, whose “reign” brought nothing but apostasy, heresy, sacrilege, impiety, confusion, chaos, and destruction. This is more important now than ever, for it is now that the New Church is getting very close to declaring Paul VI a saint. Yet Holy Scripture directs us: “…by their fruits you shall know them” (Mt 7:20).

Clearly, it’s time to inspect the fruits…

Collection of Materials on Paul VI

Radio Broadcast:
“Paul VI, the Pre-Bergoglio”
Listen free at any time

Reality Check:
The Roman Catholic Sanctuary
Before Paul VI…

Genuine Roman Catholic Sanctuary

After Paul VI

Novus Ordo “Worship Space”:
A New Sanctuary for a New Religion
Paul VI single-handedly destroyed the Roman Catholic Mass!

Related:

Heroic Virtue? Not Exactly…
An Inconvenient Video:
Who Was Paul VI?

See Also: Paul VI Responded to Accusations, Denied being a Homosexual

Let’s not forget who first recognized Montini’s “heroic virtue”:

Benedict XVI signs Decree Recognizing
Supposed “Heroic Virtue” of Apostate Paul VI

Cover of Time Magazine, September 24, 1965

So, what else does it take? What more proof do people need that an organization that can “beatify” and recognize “heroic virtue” in an impious apostate monster like Paul VI cannot possibly be the Roman Catholic Church, the Spotless Bride of Christ?

Francis declares Paul VI “Blessed”—
Benedict XVI Attends Ceremony

paul6 broken cross.jpg

Saint or Devil?
Only a False Church can Canonize False Saints

 

paul6-goofy.jpg

Paul VI to be “Canonized”?

Semi-Traditionalist John Vennari exposes the ridiculous idea of a “Saint” Paul VI, yet still refuses to acknowledge that these lies and impieties cannot come from the Roman Catholic Church, which is spotless, infallible, and indefectible. These horrific shenanigans are being perpetrated by the Novus Ordo Church, the ape of the Catholic Church, prophesied by the Venerable Anne Catherine Emmerich as the “Church of Darkness” which we must beg God “to leave Rome”. The Novus Ordo Church is nothing but a sewer of apostasy, heresy, and impiety.

“Cardinals” Vote Unanimously in Favor
of False Pope Paul VI’s “Canonization”

In the New Church of Vatican II, you can institute and preside over the Great Apostasy, let loose a deluge of heresy, impiety, and sacrilege on the faithful – and get rewarded with “sainthood” and recognition of “heroic virtue” in the end. This says all you need to know about the abominable Vatican II Sect. To say that this impious cult could be the product of the Holy Ghost, the Roman Catholic Church, is blasphemy!

Since the creation of the Novus Ordo Church in 1958, every single deceased “Pope” has been either “beatified” or “canonized”, or is on his way to either. What’s going on here? It’s clear: They want to and need to “canonize” the Vatican II council and the New Church. Though the Catholic Church only produced 2 canonized saint Popes between 1566 and 1958 (Pius V and Pius X), the Novus Ordo church claims, essentially, to have had nothing but “sainted Popes” since then. How much more laughable can it get?!

“And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and the Lord hath remembered her iniquities.” (Apoc 18:4-5)

The Death of Paul VI:
“As though he had Exploded from Within”

August 6, 1978

Paul VI’s biographer, Peter Hebblethwaite, relates the following about the soul-destroying Antipope’s death, in his 1993 book:

paul6-hebblethwaite.jpg
“As Mass ends Paul has a massive heart attack. It is as though he had exploded from within. [Rev. John] Magee thinks he would have been thrown out of bed had his hand not been held” (Peter Hebblethwaite, Paul VI: The First Modern Pope, p. 710).

 

The Broken Cross of False “Pope” Paul VI

Let us never forget the hideous and blasphemous so-called “Broken Cross” Paul VI introduced and used as his crozier. It is a bent cross with Our Lord’s Body displayed in a repulsive fashion. This impious crozier has also been used by John Paul I, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI, and, after a hiatus, has recently been brought back by Francis.

See Also: Henry Makow: “Is the Pope a Catholic?”

“VENERABLE”?
“Execrable” is more like it: Clearly No Transfiguration for Paul VI

paul6-black.jpg

“Pope” Paul VI lying in state on August 10, 1978

paul6-black2.jpg

Giovanni Battista Montini died on August 6, 1978,
the Feast of the Transfiguration


See Also: 
Freaky Portrait of Paul VI Celebrates 30 Years in the Vatican


Sainthood? The Case Against Paul VI

Antipope Paul VI lying in state

Before the funeral, Paul VI’s body had to be injected with more formaldehyde because it was already decomposing as it was being transported a mere 15 miles from Castelgandolfo to St. Peter’s! (Source: TIME Magazine, “In Search of a Pope”, Aug. 21, 1978) Verbatim: “With the Pope garbed in a red chasuble, slippers and gloves and a gold-and-white miter on his head, some 60,000 mourners filed past his body. Then, with more than 5,000 soldiers and police standing guard against Italy’s unpredictable terrorists, a hearse drove the body along the 15-mile route to St. Peter’s. For a time the body was sealed in its casket. But when Cardinals arriving in Rome voiced disappointment, it was again put on view—in front of the high altar, where only the Pope or his delegate may say Mass. (The body had to be injected with more formaldehyde because it was already decomposing in the late summer heat.)”

Quick Novus Ordo Watch comment on the above: Pope St. Pius X also died in the hot summer month of August (1914) and did not decompose — he, a true saint (canonized by Pius XII in 1954), is incorrupt! (More info here) See this beautiful photo of St. Pius X shortly after he went to His Eternal Reward — what a contrast to the rotting and rotten Paul VI!

"Paul VI: Beatified?" by Dr. Luigi Villa

Paul VI … Beatified?
by Fr. Luigi Villa

Available also in Spanish, Italian, French — More Information and Related Books and other Items at these sites:

See Also:

The New Montinian Church
by Fr. Joaquin Saenz y Arriaga

saenz-book.jpg

BACK IN PRINT!

This is an exposition of the False New Church — the Vatican II Church — of Giovanni Battista Montini, otherwise known as “Pope” Paul VI, published first in 1971

Fr. Joaquin Saenz y Arriaga

About the author: Mexican Fr. Saenz y Arriaga was perhaps the first publicly sedevacantist priest. He was “excommunicated” by the Novus Ordo Church for exposing Montini/Paul VI and his new religion. In 1973, Saenz published a follow-up work called Sede Vacante: Paulo VI no es Papa legítimo (Sede Vacante: Paul VI is not a legitimate Pope), a sedevacantist manifesto. Read more about Fr. Saenz y Arriaga and his work here.

 

 

Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli aka ‘John XXIII’

Miscellaneous Information

 

Special Features

 

Free Book for Download (PDF):
John XXIII a “Blessed” Too?
by Fr. Luigi Villa

villa-john23-beato.jpg

CLICK BOOK COVER TO DOWNLOAD PDF

 

Video:
Who was John XXIII?

 

Free Book Download (PDF):
Nichita Roncalli: Counterlife of a Pope
by Franco Bellegrandi

nichita-roncalli.jpg

CLICK BOOK COVER TO DOWNLOAD PDF

 

Video:
The Conclave of 1958

Send this to friend